Tuesday, May 12, 2009

"Victims" part 2



Recent press coverage of Acting Chief Maloney and other Law Enforcement personnel has drawn a variety of responses from the public, as read in their commentaries. Some are supportive, some make doughnut jokes (Really, donut jokes? Brilliant.), while others respond as if this is Law Enforcement’s first response to the issue.

Two of the most frustrating issues I have faced in the last 15 or so years in the emergency services, is 1) the media’s apparent inability to get the facts of the story straight, and 2) the public basing their perception on those stories.

Here are a few examples of responses in this latest story as presented in the Chico Enterprise Record:

Chico Resident (if that is your REAL fake name) says:

"Blah Blah. Talk is cheap. It takes three serious robberies before something is done. What about sting operations. Extra patrols during evening hours. The attacks happen from 11pm to 5am Thats when you need extra patrols. Protect the public already.STAY AWAY FROM THE BIKE PATH"

Jesse William Walker says:
"Seventeen attacks in four months and the top cop says ""We do not want to create a hysteria and suggest at all that this is an unsafe area and people should actually avoid it," During all of that time the cops do nothing. It's the same doughnut shop menatality they always have until the media lights a fire under their ****. After the first couple of attacks the cops could have put an undercover decoy and a couple of cops as backup into the act every night until the made arrests but instead they have all of their patrolmen and detectives "cracking down on parole and probation violators". Imagine, all available cops spending entire shifts every day of every week cracking down on parolees. We really do have a problem in Chico, but I think it is with a police force. Our cops don't want to get out of their patrol cars unless it is to get a doughnut."

Cornelius Cakely says:
"These attacks have been going on for a year and a half while the police have sat on their hands and whined that they don't have enough money. And what does the police chief say:"People just need to take a degree of responsibility on their own." Great! What an absurd situation.The Chico police are utterly pathetic. How many more people must be beaten unconscious and robbed on the bike trails around Chico State before they get proactive? Instead they hold press conferences at the scene of the crimes! There is a clear pattern to these attacks. These thugs could be caught in one night with an undercover decoy operation but the Chico police are too busy holding press conferences and writing traffic tickets to do that! Obviously they find that more profitable and less dangerous than protecting the public."

These statements in my opinion are made from people who get their “reality” from the media. It’s interesting to read people’s responses in the Enterprise Record and other media commentaries. So many people base their opinions on partial information (as presented in the press). Additionally, until the blog age, there has been little that Law Enforcement could do to keep the various news sources from editorializing our press releases.

The general public places a great deal of trust in the printed word. It didn’t occur to me until a great man told me that the news media is a private enterprise. I had never considered the fact that there is nothing to ensure that the media source will not present the "facts" of the story in a way that will suit their personal agendas.

People’s choices in large part are based on life’s experiences and perception of facts presented(such as those posed in the media). Our choices as Police Officers are also based on facts and perception. Perception is sometimes all we have to go on. Scenarios presented in seconds, with little to no time to react are responded to with the Officer’s perception of the situation and his/her training.

I recall one situation when I was working as a Cannabis Investigator with the Butte County Sheriff’s Office. My partner was interviewing a suspect in the kitchen and I was conducting a search of the living room. All of a sudden, I heard a loud commotion in the kitchen, consisting of the dogs barking, the table slamming into the wall, chairs sliding back, and the suspect running out into the hallway. My perception of the situation? The suspect assaulted my partner and was making a break for it.

I grabbed the suspect and got ready to punch him (yes, we get to do that sometimes). The suspect saw my actions and I felt him immediately submit. No punch.

When my partner came into the hallway out of breath, he saw my posture and called for me to stop. It seems that the dogs began to fight under the table and both my partner and the suspect were doing all they could to get away.

Lesson learned: things are not always as they seem. Would I have been justified in continuing my actions? Yes, if he would have kept up his “escape.” Perception is sometimes all we have.

Several people are calling for undercover stings and the like regarding these robberies. There are some topical points as well as some grave realities involved in dealing with this situation.

The first is that these robberies happen within minutes, if not less. The general area covers several blocks with numerous areas out of sight of the general public. There is no hope of having all Officers in all places, at all times. This is where the public comes in. Ending the “Stop Snitchin” nonsense that permeates our society and not hiding behind fear of retaliation is a good start. As Acting Chief Maloney says, "We will put resources toward this, and continue to put resources toward it, but we have to believe there are citizens out there with information that might help us solve these crimes."

Some hope that the Police as well as the government will do everything for them, abdicating any responsibility to care for themselves. This is a blind road to follow and can lead to severe consequences. In his book, “The Gift of Fear”, Gavin De Becker indicates that those who accept the fact that bad things (like robberies) can happen to them, deal better psychologically than those who walk around with blinders (condition white).

In one recent case, the victims were beaten 10 minutes after being warned by Officers that the bike path was unsafe at that hour. What do those Officers know? Apparently enough in this case.

Realities: putting an Officer in that situation is placing them in an extremely dangerous and likely will result in a lethal force situation. In general, more than two suspects (as is the general m.o. of these crimes) attempting to assault an Officer is a lethal force situation and the likelihood that someone is going to get shot is high. Add a suspect with a gun in the mix, and the outcome has a likely outcome. Every time an Officer goes to work, the thought is in the back of his mind that he may have to take a life. This not a pleasant thought, but is a necessary realization which will help keep the Officer alive.

The public needs to face this eventuality when they call for undercover operations and the like. There was a time when the majority of the public understood Law Enforcement’s reactions to such danger, but several social factors developed over a long time have worn down people’s resolve, in my opinion. It seems that people in general need to be pushed much further before they will stand for themselves or accept violent responses from Law Enforcement.

I believe in peace, but not at all costs. Not to cower in submission to Fascists and definitely not at the cost of letting myself or my loved ones become a victim. We were not designed to lie down like dogs.

So, again, there are places in this world where one needs to use common sense. Of course there are those who will say, “Well, this is America and I should be able to go where I want to.” To them I say, “You’re right.” But please understand that there are bad people in this world. They are willing to do bad things to you, and maybe a little forethought is in order. As Acting Chief Maloney said, “People just need to take a degree of responsibility on their own."

Public assistance and information is the key to solving this problem.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Re: Victims 1 & 2 specifically "Please help us to protect you by staying away from those situations and places where bad things are likely to happen. Situational awareness is one of the keys to personal safety."

And ...

Chief Maloney's comment "Citizens need to take a degree of responsibility."

True words, good advice. We do not live in an ideal world, but neither should we live in fear. Nevertheless discretion is better than the naive idea that you can go anywhere, anytime with impunity.

Certainly it is outrageous that some vicious thugs have free reign (so far), but the police cannot be everywhere all the time. Perhaps this area would make an excellent target for a neighborhood watch group.

I am confident that the Chico PD is doing everything they can to stop these crimes and bring the perpetrators to justice. I have to wonder, is the neighborhood doing the same?

Anonymous said...

By the way, I do not believe the comments found in the ER's Topix pages reflect the attitudes of the citizens of Chico as a whole, in part, or even in a significant fraction. The hate filled, narrow view, ignorant comments are from a toxic and dysfunctional few who with an ax to grind, a bruised ego to boost, or are simply bored and have too much time on their hands.

Frankly, I am ashamed to say that I have bothered to read such mean spirited nonsense. It makes me almost think the US is packed with angry, poisonous people who have no clue what civil behavior means.

But I know better.